Gold prices have shed more than 23% from their January all-time high of $5,608.35 per troy ounce, briefly crossing into bear-market territory in mid-June before stabilizing near $4,266. The speed of the decline, 20% in just 91 days from the January 29 peak, marks the fastest such drop since the 2008 financial crisis.

Despite the severity of the drawdown, major Wall Street banks are holding year-end targets well above current prices, and the structural forces behind gold’s multi-year rally, rising public debt, persistent inflation, central-bank credibility strain, remain largely intact. What looks like a crash may be a correction within a secular bull market that still has room to run.

That framing matters for metals investors trying to separate signal from noise. A 23% decline sounds catastrophic until you measure it against a 126% gain since the start of 2023. The question is whether the selling reflects a genuine regime change or the kind of violent shakeout that has historically preceded the next leg higher.

What Drove the Selloff

The proximate causes are layered. Money reported that governments have been converting gold reserves to dollars in response to surging energy costs, while Middle Eastern oil producers, squeezed by reduced oil revenues tied to the Iran war, have tapped gold liquidity to shore up their balance sheets. Those are real, forced sellers, and forced selling creates price dislocations that overshoot fundamentals.

Meanwhile, the U.S. dollar has clawed back some ground. The greenback is still down roughly 11% since the start of President Trump’s second term, but it has gained nearly 4% since February. A firmer dollar reduces the incentive for foreign buyers to accumulate gold, and it mechanically pressures dollar-denominated commodity prices.

Equity markets have also drawn capital away from metals. With stock indexes hitting record highs, the opportunity cost of holding a non-yielding asset like gold rises. That behavioral rotation is nothing new, but it compounds the selling pressure when it coincides with sovereign liquidation and a dollar bounce.

Related Posts
Fed rate hikes may run deeper than Wall Street expected

As we explored in our recent analysis of gold’s six-month low, the disconnect between rising inflation and falling gold prices has confused investors who assume the two should always move in tandem. They don’t, at least not on every time horizon.

The Inflation Backdrop Is Anything but Calm

Consumer prices hit 4.2% in May, the highest reading in three years, driven largely by a 23.5% year-over-year spike in energy costs. That is a sharp reversal from the post-pandemic CPI bottom of 2.3% reached in April 2025. The Iran war’s disruption to energy markets has pushed fuel costs into the kind of territory that feeds through to everything from transportation to food.

Jordan Rizzuto, chief investment officer at GammaRoad Capital Partners, connected the dots between geopolitical stress and gold’s sensitivity:

“Gold has shown that it is highly sensitive this year. Since the outbreak of the [Iran] war, to whatever the perceived path of the Fed’s monetary policy is… gold has really moved down in tandem.”

That observation cuts both ways. If gold is moving in lockstep with shifting rate expectations, then the metal’s trajectory depends heavily on what the Fed does next, and on whether 4.2% CPI forces the central bank into a posture that temporarily strengthens the dollar at gold’s expense.

The dynamic around Fed policy under Chair Warsh adds another layer of uncertainty. Perceived hawkishness can pressure gold in the short term even as the underlying fiscal trajectory, deficits, debt service costs, political pressure on rates, supports it over the longer arc.

A Correction, Not a Collapse

Rizzuto made the historical case plainly. During gold’s legendary 1970s bull run, corrections of nearly 30% occurred. In the late 1970s, the metal dropped almost 46% before going on to gain “many multiples higher.” A 23% pullback, measured against a move that more than doubled gold’s price in three and a half years, fits comfortably within that pattern.

“I think it’s behavioral after we’ve seen a multiyear run-up. And if you look at a long-term [price] chart going back at least to the early ’70s, during the large multiyear secular bull markets for gold, a 20% correction is perfectly within reasonable expectations.”

The speed of this correction does stand out. In gold’s previous bear market in 2022, it took 282 days for prices to fall 25%. This time, the 20% threshold was breached in 91 days. That velocity echoes the 2008 financial crisis, when forced liquidation across asset classes dragged gold lower before it resumed its climb.

Speed alone does not determine whether a decline becomes permanent. What matters is whether the structural drivers that powered the rally have changed. Rizzuto argued they have not:

“If you look at the underlying long-term drivers for gold, they seem to still be in place. And if you look at historical comparisons, we seem to be in very different circumstances today than at prior gold peaks.”

Economist Robin Brooks offered a complementary view. As National Review detailed, Brooks noted that despite a jarring single-day drop of 9% in gold and 26% in silver in late January, the decline only took prices back to levels seen a few weeks earlier, given how dramatically they had previously surged. His assessment was blunt:

“Public debt is high and rising. This pushes up longer-term yields, which makes it inevitable that political pressure on the Fed to cut interest rates and cap longer-term yields will mount. The debasement trade has a lot further to run no matter who the next Fed Chair is.”

That framing, the “debasement trade”, captures the structural logic that underpins gold’s multi-year advance. When sovereign debt loads are this large and political incentives push relentlessly toward accommodation, the purchasing power of fiat currencies erodes over time. Gold is the asset that sits on the other side of that equation.

Wall Street Still Sees Higher Prices

The gap between current prices and major bank forecasts is striking. JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo are maintaining year-end gold targets in the $6,000 to $6,300 range. Goldman Sachs projects $4,900 by year-end, having cut its target from $5,400 in June. Even Morgan Stanley, the most conservative of the group, targets $4,800 to $5,200 per troy ounce by the end of 2026.

At gold’s current level near $4,266, Morgan Stanley’s lower-bound target implies roughly 12% upside. Rizzuto noted that the more conservative forecast still suggests as much as 22% potential upside from current prices. The banks with the highest targets are implying gold could rally 40% or more from here before year-end.

Those are forecasts, not guarantees. Bank price targets are notoriously subject to revision, and Goldman’s own forecast history shows how quickly the numbers can shift when rate expectations change. But the unanimity of the directional call, every major bank sees gold higher, is worth noting, especially when measured against the panic narrative that accompanies a 23% decline.

Volatility Is the Price of Admission

Rizzuto was careful to distinguish between the long-term thesis and the near-term experience:

“Gold is like any commodity, it’s a very volatile asset. And while this may not be the top of this bull cycle, we could certainly continue to see more volatility in price discovery in the months ahead. So when we say the story is intact, we’re talking about the big picture, the decade-long view.”

That distinction matters. Investors who hold gold as portfolio insurance against currency debasement, fiscal excess, and geopolitical disruption need to tolerate drawdowns that would be unacceptable in a bond portfolio. The 1970s analogy is instructive precisely because the corrections were brutal and the ultimate gains were enormous.

The current environment adds a specific complication: sticky inflation driven by energy costs, which forces governments to liquidate reserves and creates selling pressure that works against gold in the short term even as it validates the long-term case. When governments sell gold to buy dollars to buy oil, the metal’s price falls, but the reason they need to do it underscores exactly why gold matters as a store of value.

Options market activity has reflected the tension. As we covered in our look at large options bets targeting further gold downside, some sophisticated traders have been positioning for additional weakness. Whether those bets pay off depends on whether the forced selling from sovereign and energy-sector sources continues or whether the correction has already flushed out the weakest hands.

What Matters From Here

The key variables are identifiable even if their resolution is not. The Iran conflict’s trajectory will shape energy prices, which in turn drive both inflation readings and sovereign gold liquidation. The Fed’s response to 4.2% CPI will determine whether the dollar continues to firm or rolls over again. And the equity market’s ability to sustain record highs will dictate how much capital stays parked in stocks rather than flowing back into hard assets.

Rizzuto flagged one underappreciated risk: the stickiness of elevated price levels.

“The uncertainty raises at least a non-trivial possibility that higher price levels are going to be more sticky.”

If inflation proves more persistent than transitory, a pattern that has repeated across multiple cycles in the post-pandemic era, the case for gold as a long-duration hedge only strengthens. The correction may shake out momentum traders and leveraged speculators, but it does not alter the arithmetic of rising debt, expanding deficits, and the political incentives that prevent any serious fiscal consolidation.

For readers weighing their exposure, the practical question is not whether gold will be volatile. It will. The question is whether the forces that drove a 126% gain in three and a half years have reversed or merely paused. Every major bank forecast and every structural indicator in the current fact set points toward the latter.

Bear markets in gold have historically been buying opportunities for patient capital. The system’s debts have not shrunk. The printing press has not been retired. And the reasons people own gold have not changed just because the price did.