Colorado still has one working gold mine, and it is not a museum piece. The Cripple Creek and Victor operation, about 45 miles west of Colorado Springs, produced more than $830 million in economic activity across the state last year, The Colorado Sun reported after the mine’s general manager unveiled a new impact study.

For metals investors, the report is less a curiosity than a balance-sheet reminder: a single domestic gold producer can still anchor rural payrolls, local tax bases, and multi-decade mine-life economics even when most public attention stays fixed on bullion prices and paper claims.

Denver-based SSR Mining owns the mine after purchasing the operation in 2025. General manager Lowe Billingsley presented the figures and put the workforce at the center of the story rather than the metal itself.

Billingsley said the mine’s people carry the weight of those numbers.

“Our employees, they’re very skilled, hardworking and proud of what they do,”

He continued:

Related Posts
JPMorgan: Bitcoin could outrun gold if hedges unwind

“They’re also parents, neighbors, coaches, volunteers and customers of local businesses. Their work is what makes these economic contributions possible and they deserve much of the credit reflected in this report.”

That framing matters for anyone who tracks hard assets. Gold mines do not only ship ounces. They convert ore into wages, contractor spend, school funding, and municipal cash flow in places with thin tax bases.

What the report actually measured

Statewide, the mine supported 942 jobs last year and produced $38 million in state and local tax revenue. In the Pikes Peak region alone, the study put economic activity at $704 million and counted 789 direct and indirect jobs.

Production ran about 153,000 ounces of gold last year, nearly five tons, with the metal valued at $3,634 per ounce in the figures cited from SSR Mining. The mine employs 438 people. More than half live in Teller County, 110 live in Fremont County, and 80 live in El Paso County.

Average pay sits near $94,000 a year. That is more than 35% above the average annual wage in El Paso County and 75% above the average in Teller County. Gold mining accounts for more than half of Teller County’s annual gross domestic product, the report stated.

Those are the kind of concentration numbers that show why a single mine can dominate a rural county’s fortunes in ways a diversified metro never feels. Similar scale questions appear whenever a jurisdiction leans hard on gold output, a pattern also visible in our coverage of Ghana’s record gold production and its economic weight.

Small towns, large checks

Local officials treated the report as confirmation of dependence, not decoration.

Johnna Reeder Kleymeyer, president and CEO of the Colorado Springs Chamber and Economic Development Corporation, tied the mine to Colorado’s industrial identity.

“When we talk about industries that built Colorado, we have to start with mining,”

She added:

“Long before we have experienced the benefits of having pillars of aerospace and defense, cybersecurity and technology and advanced manufacturing, truly mining was what helped put Colorado on the map.”

SSR channels direct community money as well. Community-based committees in Victor and Cripple Creek each receive $100,000 a year to distribute for local projects. The Cripple Creek Victor School District receives $20,000 each year for field trips, children’s programs, and other projects, including care for the school’s turtles.

Victor’s mayor, Barbara Manning, described a sharper constraint. The town has about 400 residents. A new 25-year water-rights contract with the mine is expected to bring about $15 million to Victor. Manning linked mine income to basic infrastructure the town cannot fund from residents alone.

“We only have a tax base of about 400 residents. You cannot run a city on a tax income of 400 residents, so the mine’s income will allow us to have better infrastructure repairs to ancient, truly ancient, infrastructure that needs to be replaced or modernized at least,”

She also said:

“We greatly appreciate having SSR having the mine in our backyard,”

Cripple Creek Mayor Annie Durham pointed to community payments, school support, and air-quality monitoring. Previous owners operated two monitors, one north and one south of the mine, and said those met legal requirements. SSR installed three more continuous monitors after taking control.

Public tours restarted this month after a six-year hiatus that began at the start of the pandemic. Manning noted tourism draw around a massive troll sculpture named Rita by Danish artist Thomas Dambo, another small but real cash channel for a town that needs every visitor it can get.

Mine life, permits, and the investor’s clock

The report also looked forward. Under a proposed state permit amendment that would extend the mine’s life, the operation could create an additional $262 million in annual economic activity through 2050. The document does not state whether that amendment has been filed, approved, or merely modeled.

That gap is material. Mine economics are duration economics. Ounces in the ground only matter if the permit clock, capital plan, and operating costs line up. Investors who follow first-pour milestones and valuation gaps, including cases like Montage Gold’s Koné start-up and the market’s pricing lag, already know how quickly narrative and cash flow can diverge.

Billingsley said he expects the mine to keep providing high-paying, quality jobs in rural parts of the state. For portfolio readers, the practical questions sit one layer deeper than civic pride:

  1. How much of a county’s GDP and wage base sits on one mine’s continuity?
  2. What happens to municipal budgets if permit life shortens or costs spike?
  3. How should investors separate physical gold exposure from single-asset equity and royalty risk?
  4. When community payments and water contracts become part of the local operating system, how sticky is political support for extended mine life?

Single-mine stories can turn fast when production guidance slips or unit costs jump, a lesson repeated in our reporting on Kinross after a production cut and cost surge. The Colorado figures do not forecast SSR’s equity path. They do show why operational durability, not just the spot price, governs real-world impact.

What metals readers should take from Cripple Creek

Gold remains a monetary asset first. But monetary metals still come out of holes in the ground, staffed by people who buy groceries, pay property taxes, and keep small-town water systems solvent. Cripple Creek and Victor is Colorado’s only active gold mine. The report’s $830 million statewide print, $38 million in taxes, and county-level GDP share make that fact concrete.

SSR’s 2025 purchase, the higher wage base, and the proposed life-extension economics also underline a familiar split. Bullion tracks monetary confidence, real yields, and liquidity. Miners track permits, grades, labor, power, and local consent. Those are different risk stacks. Readers who treat them as interchangeable usually learn the difference the hard way, a point that also runs through our look at why Kinross risk runs deeper than one selloff.

None of this requires romanticizing extraction. It requires counting. A rural tax base of a few hundred residents cannot self-fund ancient infrastructure. A county that draws more than half its GDP from gold mining is levered to one complex. And a state with a single active gold mine has less domestic production redundancy than casual market chatter implies.

Capital preservation still starts with clear categories: metal, miner, municipality, and permit. Cripple Creek’s report is a clean case study in how those categories lock together when the ore body is real and the town has few substitutes.

When official narratives talk about growth in the abstract, check who still digs, who still pays the local bills, and what happens if that one operation slows.