Three California-based men face organized criminal activity charges after allegedly posing as federal employees and coercing an elderly Texas resident into converting large sums of money into gold, the Friendswood Police Department announced this week.

The case is the second major gold-conversion fraud ring dismantled by a single small-city Texas police department in six months, underscoring how gold’s rising profile as a store of value has made it an increasingly attractive tool for criminal operations that exploit institutional trust and target vulnerable holders of liquid wealth.

Daman Preet Singh of Riverside, Mandeep Singh of Los Angeles, and Sukhvinder Singh of Lathrop were taken into custody on September 9 after Friendswood officers traveled to California and executed search warrants at homes believed to be connected to the scheme, KTRK-TV reported. The arrests came with the assistance of the LAPD Foothill Division and the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office Major Crimes Unit.

How the Scheme Worked

The suspects allegedly used spoofing technology to make phone calls appear to originate from the Friendswood Police Department itself. They posed as federal employees and directed the victim to convert money into gold. Gold packages were then sent to a FedEx store, where investigators eventually set a trap.

Related Posts
Gold steadies as strong jobs data lift Fed hike odds

The victim first contacted Friendswood police in August 2026 after growing suspicious. Detectives learned the callers were impersonating federal officials and quickly began building a case. Working with the victim, investigators arranged a fake transaction that led them to Sukhvinder Singh, who was arrested as he exited the FedEx location where the gold packages were being held.

Even after Sukhvinder’s arrest, the victim continued receiving calls from the alleged criminal organization. That persistence led investigators to identify Daman Preet Singh and Mandeep Singh as additional suspects and obtain arrest warrants in Galveston County.

The bond amounts alone signal how seriously prosecutors are treating the case. Daman Preet Singh’s bond was set at $10 million. Mandeep Singh’s was set at $5 million. Sukhvinder Singh, charged with theft of over $300,000 and engaging in organized criminal activity, received a $1 million bond and is also being held on a federal immigration detainer. Daman and Mandeep remain in California awaiting extradition to Galveston County.

A Pattern That Keeps Repeating

This is not an isolated case for Friendswood. In March 2026, the same department announced the arrests of six suspects connected to an organized gold scam linked to approximately $2.8 million in losses involving elderly Texas victims. Whether the two cases are directly connected remains unclear from the available reporting, but the operational similarities are hard to miss: impersonation, coercion, gold conversion, and elderly targets.

The pattern extends well beyond Texas. NYPD has warned that gold bar scams have drained more than $100 million from older New Yorkers, using nearly identical playbooks involving impersonation of government officials and urgent demands to move assets into physical gold.

Friendswood Police Chief Josh Rogers praised the cross-state cooperation that made the September 9 operation possible:

“The professionalism, time, and effort that we were shown while in California were truly remarkable. The support we received from the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office Major Crimes Unit and the LAPD Foothill Division went far beyond what we could have asked for. We are incredibly grateful for their assistance and the way they welcomed and supported the Friendswood Police Department.”

The department also issued a public advisory urging anyone who believes they or someone they know may be the target of a similar scam to stop communicating with the suspected scammers and immediately contact local law enforcement.

Why Gold Scams Are a Metals-Market Story

For readers of this publication, gold-conversion fraud matters on two levels. The first is practical. The second is structural.

On the practical side, these schemes exploit the very qualities that make gold attractive as a capital-preservation tool. Gold is portable, liquid, difficult to trace once physically transferred, and widely understood as a store of value. Those same properties make it a magnet for fraud operations targeting people who hold significant liquid assets. A Wisconsin woman lost $433,000 in a gold bar scam that followed a nearly identical script: impersonation of trusted institutions, urgency, and instructions to convert cash into gold bars.

The structural concern is broader. As gold prices have climbed and public awareness of bullion as a savings vehicle has grown, the pool of potential victims has expanded. Elderly holders of cash and retirement savings are particularly vulnerable because they tend to trust institutional authority, hold concentrated liquid wealth, and may be less familiar with spoofing technology and social-engineering tactics.

The Friendswood case illustrates how organized these operations have become. This was not a lone confidence artist. It was a multi-state ring with multiple operatives, spoofed phone numbers, a logistics chain involving FedEx, and enough operational discipline to keep calling the victim even after one member was arrested. The $10 million bond set for one suspect reflects a judicial assessment that the scope of the operation likely extends well beyond a single victim and a single $300,000 theft charge.

The Scale of the Problem

Imposter scams alone have cost Americans billions, and gold-conversion fraud is one of the fastest-growing subcategories within that universe. The common thread is the exploitation of institutional trust. Victims comply because they believe they are speaking with law enforcement, the IRS, or another federal agency. The spoofing technology makes the deception convincing enough that even cautious people can be caught off guard.

For gold holders and prospective buyers, the takeaway is straightforward:

  • No legitimate federal agency or law enforcement body will ever call and instruct you to convert assets into gold.
  • Caller ID can be spoofed to display any number, including your local police department.
  • If you receive such a call, hang up and contact the agency directly through a verified number.
  • Physical gold transactions should be conducted through established dealers and custodians, not directed by unsolicited callers.

Gold’s Dual Edge

Gold’s appeal as a monetary asset rests on its independence from the credit system, its portability, and its resistance to dilution. Those are real properties with real value for capital preservation. But those same properties create an attack surface for criminal operations that understand how to weaponize trust.

The case of a former CIA official linked to $40 million in gold bars and facing a plea deal is another reminder that gold’s anonymity and portability cut both ways. The metal itself is neutral. The ecosystem around it requires vigilance.

Friendswood is a city of roughly 40,000 people southeast of Houston. That its police department has now dismantled two organized gold-fraud rings in six months tells you something about how widely these networks have spread. The $2.8 million in losses from the March case and the $300,000-plus theft charge in the current case represent only what investigators have documented so far. The actual figures are almost certainly higher.

The bonds in this case range from $1 million to $10 million. Those are not numbers assigned to petty theft. They reflect a law enforcement assessment that these suspects are part of something larger, something still being unraveled.

Gold remains one of the best tools available for preserving purchasing power outside the banking system. But any tool worth stealing is a tool worth protecting. The real defense is not avoiding gold. It is understanding that no one who calls you out of the blue has your interests at heart.