Morgan Stanley’s Michael Wilson is telling clients that the best profit growth in years is no longer confined to a handful of technology giants. With Q2 earnings season set to begin, Wilson’s team argues the rally is spreading to the median stock, a shift that could reshape how capital flows between equities and hard assets for the rest of 2026.

When Wall Street’s biggest shops declare that equity earnings are broadening, the immediate effect is to pull risk appetite away from defensive positioning and safe-haven metals. For gold and silver investors, the question is whether the profit story holds up under scrutiny or whether the enthusiasm is running ahead of the cycle.

The case, as Bloomberg reported via Yahoo Finance, rests on a striking data point: the median constituent of the S&P 1500 Composite Index is now generating earnings-per-share growth above 10%, the strongest reading since the post-Covid recovery. Wilson’s note calls this “earnings resiliency from the median stock” and expects the broadening to continue.

The Numbers Behind the Call

Bloomberg Intelligence data cited in the report shows analysts expect S&P 500 firms to post a 23% jump in profits for the second quarter. That figure, if it materializes, would rank among the best readings ever recorded outside recoveries from major recessions. The sheer magnitude of the forecast is worth pausing on. A 23% profit surge in a period not immediately following a deep contraction is rare enough to warrant skepticism as much as enthusiasm.

Related Posts
Copper hits all-time high as tariff fears drain supply

Wilson’s team pointed to another signal: the equal-weighted S&P 500 index is outperforming the market-capitalization weighted gauge for the first time since 2022. That distinction matters. When the equal-weighted version leads, it means gains are distributed more broadly across companies rather than concentrated in a few mega-cap names. For the past several years, the cap-weighted index has been dragged higher by a narrow group of technology stocks. A genuine broadening would represent a meaningful change in market character.

Analysts are also upgrading profit estimates for consumer discretionary and transport sectors, two areas that tend to reflect real economic activity rather than speculative enthusiasm around artificial intelligence or cloud spending.

RBC Doubles Down on Tech

Not everyone is rotating away from technology. Lori Calvasina at RBC Capital Markets raised the tech sector to overweight in a separate note, citing strong revenue and earnings estimate upgrades alongside a resumption in fund inflows. Her reasoning is worth hearing in full:

“Tech valuations admittedly aren’t cheap, but in our latest update the sector is only slightly above the long-term average on median absolute and relative P/E.”

That framing is careful. Calvasina is not arguing tech is cheap. She is arguing it is not yet dangerously expensive relative to history, and that the earnings trajectory justifies staying overweight. The combination of Wilson’s broadening thesis and Calvasina’s tech upgrade creates a picture where Wall Street sees strength almost everywhere in the equity complex. That kind of consensus optimism has implications for metals.

What Equity Euphoria Means for Gold

Gold tends to attract capital when investors are worried about purchasing power, credit stress, or policy error. When equity strategists at major banks are projecting 23% profit growth and urging clients into both tech and cyclical stocks, the gravitational pull on capital runs the other direction. Risk appetite expands. Safe-haven demand contracts at the margin.

This is the surface-level read, and it is not wrong as far as it goes. But the metals investor should look deeper.

Wilson’s macro calls have not always been this upbeat. Back in 2019, Newsmax reported on a Wilson note in which the same strategist warned that “US earnings and economic risk is greater than most investors may think,” flagging recession risk tied to yield-curve inversion and trade tensions. Wilson’s adjusted yield curve had been inverted for roughly six months at that time, putting the economy “in the zone” for a recession watch. The contrast between that warning and today’s bullish broadening call is instructive. Strategists respond to data as it arrives, and their positioning shifts accordingly. The question for metals holders is whether the current data is as durable as the forecast implies.

A 23% profit jump sounds extraordinary. But earnings estimates are just that: estimates. They can be revised downward as companies report, and the gap between consensus expectations and actual results has been a source of volatility in recent cycles. As we noted in our coverage of stock market valuations reaching extremes last seen before the dot-com crash, elevated earnings multiples leave little room for disappointment.

The Broadening Thesis and Its Limits

The equal-weighted S&P 500 outperforming the cap-weighted version is a real development, not a projection. It reflects actual trading behavior. Money is moving into smaller and mid-cap names at a pace not seen in four years. That shift can sustain itself if economic conditions cooperate.

But broadening carries its own risks. When gains spread from a narrow group of cash-rich tech firms to more economically sensitive sectors like consumer discretionary and transport, the rally becomes more dependent on the real economy holding up. Transport earnings, in particular, are a direct read on goods movement. If those estimates are being upgraded, someone is betting that consumer spending and industrial activity remain healthy through the second half of the year.

That bet could prove correct. It could also prove fragile. The distinction matters for metals positioning because gold and silver tend to perform best not when the economy is in obvious freefall, but when confidence in the prevailing narrative begins to crack. A broad equity rally built on strong earnings is truly negative for gold’s near-term momentum. A broad equity rally built on optimistic estimates that subsequently disappoint is a different animal entirely.

The pattern recalls what we examined in our analysis of Bank of America’s warning that 70% of bear market signals were flashing. Wall Street can simultaneously issue bullish earnings calls and bearish structural warnings without any sense of contradiction. The incentive structures differ across desks and across time horizons.

Hyperscaler Spending: The Unresolved Question

One area the Morgan Stanley note does not fully resolve is the payoff timeline for hyperscaler capital expenditure. The massive spending by cloud and AI infrastructure companies has driven a significant portion of tech earnings growth. Whether that spending translates into proportional revenue remains an open question. If the capex cycle begins to slow or the return on investment disappoints, the tech earnings pillar weakens, and the broadening thesis becomes less about strength spreading and more about the old leaders fading.

This uncertainty is worth watching for metals investors. A scenario where tech earnings disappoint while cyclical earnings merely meet expectations could produce a market that goes sideways or lower despite the broadening narrative. That kind of environment tends to be constructive for gold, as it raises questions about the durability of the expansion without triggering the kind of outright panic that sometimes produces indiscriminate liquidation across all asset classes.

The interplay between equity hedging flows and currency markets adds another layer. As we covered in our report on AI equity hedging flows reshaping currency markets, the sheer scale of capital moving through equity-linked strategies now has measurable effects on the dollar and, by extension, on dollar-denominated gold.

What Metals Investors Should Watch

The earnings season beginning this week will test Wilson’s thesis in real time. Big banks report first, and their results will set the tone. Several things matter for gold and silver holders:

  • Estimate revisions after reports: If the 23% profit growth forecast holds up through actual results, expect continued pressure on safe-haven demand. If companies beat on earnings but guide lower, the narrative shifts quickly.
  • Breadth of the beat: Wilson’s thesis depends on the median stock delivering. If gains remain concentrated despite the broadening narrative, the equal-weighted outperformance could reverse.
  • Rate expectations: Strong earnings reduce the urgency for Fed rate cuts, which tends to support real yields and weigh on gold. Weak earnings do the opposite.
  • Fund flows: Calvasina cited a resumption in tech fund inflows as part of her upgrade rationale. If those flows accelerate broadly into equities, gold ETFs may see continued outflows at the margin.

None of this means gold’s longer-term case is impaired. The structural drivers of metals demand, including central bank accumulation, fiscal deficits, and currency diversification, operate on a different timeline than quarterly earnings cycles. But the near-term price action in gold and silver is sensitive to risk appetite, and a Wall Street consensus that earnings are strong and broadening is a headwind for defensive positioning.

As we noted in our coverage of Goldman’s sharp gold forecast revision, the major banks’ macro calls can move metals sentiment meaningfully, even when the underlying structural case for gold remains intact.

The Bigger Picture

Wilson’s broadening call and Calvasina’s tech upgrade represent the kind of synchronized Wall Street optimism that tends to appear when the data is cooperating and the cycle feels durable. For equity investors, the message is clear: lean in. For metals investors, the message is more conditional. The equity story needs to deliver on its promises. If it does, gold may drift. If it doesn’t, the capital that flowed into cyclicals and tech on the back of these calls will need somewhere else to go.

The best earnings season in years is a real possibility. So is the possibility that consensus expectations, stretched to historic extremes, set the market up for a reaction that favors the asset class Wall Street is currently ignoring. That tension is worth more than any single strategist’s note.